Not Yet Asleep
He contemplates the fate of all the plastic
in the Pacific, pictures the hand of a hip
scofflaw tossing a cigarette on the front
lawn from a speeding car. Each pittance
shares the same destination. A new continent
extends from Japan to California, the husk
of the last century, the dead the dollar made.
Under the blanket, his body is a comma then
a question mark. “There’s no remedy for
the multitude” he thinks and kicks the covers
from his feet. “Pacific trash vortex” – the phrase
towers in the limelight of his obsession.
He remembers: a thumbnail scratches the waxy
surface of a store-bought plum. Garbage bags,
pill bottles, cups, action figures, sunglasses,
a landscape bleached the color of a clover
flower where the ground conforms to every
step and the air is a rancid confection.
*
Suddenly Awake
He remembers the need to push the trash
container to the curb. Someone left the television
on. He extends an arm toward the chaos and the room
goes dark. Outside, the air smells like rotten plums.
With a grimace he shoves the bin with his hip
and rolls it balanced on its back wheels. Now
the garbage sits in the limelight under the lamppost.
It resembles a memorial. Clutching his back, he
contemplates the scofflaw life, letting clover
and dandelions invade the lawn, allowing waste
to mound up at the corner – first a small hill
then a rotting tower, city for the maggot multitude,
fantasy confection for flies. He curses the neighbors
who never conform, even to common sense.
An abandoned bonfire burns behind their house.
Staring at the glow, he thinks “there’s no remedy.”
As he curls back into a husk of sheets, a pittance
of sleep, the crickets cheer his absence.
* * *
This is my entry for Read Write Poem prompt #92. The idea is to use the following words: remedy, multitude, hip, scofflaw, husk, extend, plum, conform, limelight, clover, pittance, confection and sleep.
I wanted to write two poems and see how much I could link them according to style, tone, content and language.
* * *
Dana pointed out that these would read better as prose poems. They started out that way and I’m not sure why I thought they had to have wide margins. Here is her suggestion for how they might look — thanks Dana!
Not Yet Asleep
He contemplates the fate of all the plastic in the Pacific, pictures the hand of a hip scofflaw tossing a cigarette on the front lawn from a speeding car. Each pittance shares the same destination. A new continent extends from Japan to California, the husk of the last century, the dead the dollar made. Under the blanket, his body is a comma then a question mark. “There’s no remedy for the multitude” he thinks and kicks the covers from his feet. “Pacific trash vortex” – the phrase towers in the limelight of his obsession. He remembers: a thumbnail scratches the waxy surface of a store-bought plum. Garbage bags, pill bottles, cups, action figures, sunglasses, a landscape bleached the color of a clover flower where the ground conforms to every step and the air is a rancid confection.
*
Suddenly Awake
He remembers the need to push the trash container to the curb. Someone left the television on. He extends an arm toward the chaos and the room goes dark. Outside, the air smells like rotten plums. With a grimace he shoves the bin with his hip and rolls it balanced on its back wheels. Now the garbage sits in the limelight under the lamppost. It resembles a memorial. Clutching his back, he contemplates the scofflaw life, letting clover and dandelions invade the lawn, allowing waste to mound up at the corner – first a small hill then a rotting tower, city for the maggot multitude, fantasy confection for flies. He curses the neighbors who never conform, even to common sense. An abandoned bonfire burns behind their house. Staring at the glow, he thinks “there’s no remedy.” As he curls back into a husk of sheets, a pittance of sleep, the crickets cheer his absence.


39 responses so far ↓
James // September 18, 2009 at 8:06 pm |
Wow. This is really amazing. I love the way the 2 pieces fit together and how the words build different images here. The expansiveness of the trash floating in the Pacific contrasts so nicely with the more narrow perspective of the speaker’s waking life. Again, wow. Fine work.
nathan // September 18, 2009 at 9:29 pm |
Thanks James. I really appreciate that.
Therese // September 18, 2009 at 8:14 pm |
These poems rang so true with me! — the worries that replay (recycle) in our minds at night, and anxieties about planet pollution, and waking up because I’ve forgotten to put out the trash. The first poem presents a mind contemplating in general; the second poem presents a particular scene and actor. I’m curious — can this be considered an eco-poem? I admire, too, the way the two companion poems create an unarticulated synapse between them: that gap’s mystery is how his earlier contemplations result in a later thought so piercing that it wakes him up.
nathan // September 18, 2009 at 9:31 pm |
Thank you Therese. I didn’t set out to write eco-poetry but you could call these eco-poems.
“Unarticulated synapse” is so well put.
Tumblewords // September 18, 2009 at 8:32 pm |
The thought process sings through these. What humans have wrought…nightmares and carelessness. I enjoyed reading both of these – the shape of truth.
nathan // September 18, 2009 at 9:32 pm |
Thank you!
Liz // September 18, 2009 at 9:34 pm |
I love the tight focus in both of these and how they play off each other. Such compelling images too. Your use of scofflaw in the first is my favorite so far.
nathan // September 19, 2009 at 12:07 am |
Thank you Liz. Scofflaw is one of those great words that’s just hard to get away with most of the time.
Cynthia Short // September 18, 2009 at 11:45 pm |
Nathan, these are both so good…I am just wondering why you have garbage on the brain!
I think my favorite line/thought/idea/ is:
A new continent extends from japan to California, the husk of the last century, the dead the dollar made….powerful and sad.
nathan // September 19, 2009 at 12:14 am |
Thanks, Cynthia. Why do I have garbage on the brain? Maybe because there’s so much of it around.
gautami tripathy // September 19, 2009 at 12:11 am |
Wonderful images. And yes I agree Scafflow is a great word.
for a pittance, you buy that confection
nathan // September 19, 2009 at 12:15 am |
Thank you Gautami.
barbara_y // September 19, 2009 at 12:16 am |
I like the listing evoked by the plum wax, and the garbage can as memorial. husk of the last century. They’re a good pair.
nathan // September 19, 2009 at 1:27 am |
Thanks Barbara!
Via Negativa // September 19, 2009 at 1:31 am |
[...] Exhaust fumes and french fries Each pittance shares the same destination. A new continent extends from Japan to California, the husk of the last century, the dead the dollar made. —- This entry was posted Friday, September 18th, 2009 at 9:31 pm and is filed under Smorgasblog. Print [...]
nathan // September 19, 2009 at 1:35 am |
Hey Dave! Thanks for reading.
Joseph Harker // September 19, 2009 at 4:06 pm |
Excellent pair of poems… I agree with Therese, whether intentional or not, these function well as eco-poems. And you did a great job of connecting them on a theme that, really, probably not many people think about. (I remember reading somewhere that the Pacific trashscape is now the size of Texas or something?) Also, the crickets cheering his absence is a wonderful image.
nathan // September 19, 2009 at 11:16 pm |
Thanks Joseph. Yeah, I think the trash vortex is supposed to be about the size of Texas. The speaker here imagines detritus like cups and sunglasses but from what I’ve read, I think it’s more like plastic particles at or just under the surface.
Neil Reid // September 20, 2009 at 12:03 am |
Brave you, two not just one! I was glad enough just to get through the gate.
So, you think you did what you meant to do? I think you did, and certainly well. And, “He curses the neighbors who never conform, even to common sense.” I like how that mirrors itself, all the while posing the relief as well.
Dana // September 20, 2009 at 5:51 am |
Word to the motha. That’s good stuff. Princess Baby Toes approves. (A note for Nathan’s readers: Princess Baby Toes is not me, for the record. She is my new puppet. I don’t want any of you thinking I’ve started referring to myself in the third person and calling myself “Princess Baby Toes.”)
Have you ever noticed that when I am writing a lot, you aren’t writing as much. Then when I am not writing as much, you are writing a lot. Unless we are writing together, and then we just write a lot together?
And, would you like to write a series of poems like these together, where we each supply the first half then trade halves off along with the word list of which words must be included and have the other person write the second half?
You can say no. You can be all, “No!,” but you will risk making Princess Baby Toes sad.
nathan // September 20, 2009 at 11:13 am |
Hey Dana, thanks for reading this.
I think you definitely should come up with a special name to refer to yourself in the third person.
Yes! Let’s write prose poems and trade them with lists of words!
Dana // September 20, 2009 at 5:52 am |
There are some bad sentence constructions up there. I need a copyeditor.
Dana // September 20, 2009 at 5:53 am |
(P.S. I want to see these as prose poems. I am going to relineate them that way just for kicks.)
nathan // September 20, 2009 at 11:14 am |
These started out as prose poems but for some reason I felt the need to make them have wide margins.
Dana // September 20, 2009 at 5:54 am |
(I should say, *un*lineate them.)
zouxzoux // September 20, 2009 at 9:23 pm |
“allowing waste
to mound up at the corner – first a small hill
then a rotting tower, city for the maggot multitude,
fantasy confection for flies.”
Yep, that’s how it begins. I really, really like when you write environmental discord.
nathan // September 21, 2009 at 8:07 pm |
Thanks, Zouxzoux
nubia // September 21, 2009 at 2:52 am |
He curses the neighbors who never conform, even to common sense.
What a surprising line! I wasn’t expecting what came after the comma. I like that a lot.
nathan // September 21, 2009 at 8:08 pm |
Nubia, thank you for reading this.
barbara_y // September 21, 2009 at 12:51 pm |
Just re-read your re-write. I liked it before, but–wow! What a difference.
nathan // September 21, 2009 at 8:09 pm |
It does make a big difference, doesn’t it? I’m going with the prose version.
David Moolten // September 21, 2009 at 12:52 pm |
Dana is right. These are very strong. I think with the prose poem there is more of a mysterious/ fable/ folk tale quality imbued in the brevity and unstructured appearance. Here with the concentrated narrative and plotting, the sense that the subject of the poems is determined to take certain actions, the effect is one of surrealism, mystery, and alienation. The details are very vivid and the language is well crafted and the details chosen deftly. Strong work.
nathan // September 21, 2009 at 8:09 pm |
Thank you for the close reading, David.
DJ Vorreyer // September 22, 2009 at 12:53 am |
These are wonderful – the second dreamer’s plan come to life in the first piece with disastrous consequences. The sound in the second piece – starting with “city for the maggot multitude, fantasy confection for flies” – is stunning – the words seem like they could not be replaced with any other words. I like them as prose blocks – there is a powerful draw of narrative that way, espeically as they are related.
nathan // September 22, 2009 at 6:25 pm |
Donna, thank you!
Leigh Anne Vrabel // September 22, 2009 at 4:37 pm |
Like two mirrors, dream and waking! And then doubled, in prose. Wow.
nathan // September 22, 2009 at 6:25 pm |
Thanks for reading, Leigh Anne.
Jeeves // September 25, 2009 at 5:29 am |
How did you manage to spin these two wonderful poems. I struggled with words.
nathan // September 25, 2009 at 12:49 pm |
Glad you like it, Jeeves.